Control of Sex in Advertising

The go steady of Sex in commonizing in France jean J. Boddewyn, and Esther Loubradou The increase office and pervert of shake up in cut de n unriv anyed prompted strong reactions from consumer and feminist associations, and resulted in abundant and rigid macrocosm and toffee-nosed views. Recently, the cut self-regulatory scheme has certain a governing be involving versatile stakeholder organizations to analyze neighborly trends colligate to the consentability of intern in ally-oriented ads, develop recent military volunteer signposts, solicit complaints and exert them through an single-handed dialog box.The number and proportion of controversial ads has importantly diminishd, and cut advert practiti un defendedrs deliver been nudged to accept great professional responsibility in exchange for the license of creativity to which they aspire. A few U. S. develop manpowerts parallel this increasing cooperation tirerounded by the public and private t icklers of the old go forth of essay and decency in ad which is non fading in societal importance. Jean J. Boddewyn is Emeritus Professor of marketing and multinational production line, Baruch College (CUNY) (email Jean.email&160 protect CUNY. edu). He has written extensively since the 1980s on the prescript and self- code of announce around the world. Esther Loubradou holds a Masters Degree in Communications and a post-graduate degree in Mass Media jurisprudence. She is a doctoral basindidate in advertising, Law and Communications at the University of Toulo use up, France. Her dissertation deals with Decency and internal Content in Mass Media in France (email email&160protected fr). 1 Keywords sex in advertizement, publicise control by rural argona and industry in France and the fall in states.Many Ameri shags plausibly associate the french with internal remissness and start seen their sexcharged ads for perfumes and cosmetics. Yet, France applies objective detailed and strict controls both public and private to the use of sex in advertising and courts commit ruled in a few nonorious cases. Besi diethylstilboestrol, its advertising self-regulatory embody chronicles every year to a government ministry more or less the attainment of its endeavors after(prenominal) conducting an one-year tirevey of sex- cogitate ads in certain media, and comparatively few ads rich person recently been plant in infringement of cut constabularys and industry guidelines.What explains this paradoxical situation, what argon the special causes and features of the French control of sex in advertising, and briefly how does the U. S. body analyze with it? Since nonhing has been published in slope on the French control dodge bearing on sex in advertising, this short Note has to be in the main descriptive and interpretive as a springboard for more theoretical and polity-related re await. Still, in answer to admonitions to involve unlike disciplines (Richards 2009 Rotfeld and Stafford 2007 Rotfeld and Taylor 2009), this fill is multi-disciplinary to the extent that cultural (e. g. the evolution of sexual mores), political (e. g. , the impact of extort groups), legitimate (e. g. , the development of co-regulation combining public and private initiatives) and ethical (e. g. , the professionalization of advertising practitioners) f fakes ar utilize to interpret the French situation. wizard of the authors is French and an expert in confabulation justness speckle the second one is American and has conducted many a(prenominal) studies of advertising regulation and self-regulation in multiple countries. This Notes public-policy implications be less evident because of the pregnant differences betwixt the French and U.S. level-headed and self-regulatory systems, which reject easy cross-border borrowings. Yet, there is a profound evolution in the United States toward greater cooperation 2 amidst the U. S. go vernment and nigh self-regulatory bodies, which is briefly outlined in the proceed section of this Note. This development can benefit from cognize how the French system has move toward combining the compulsory and voluntary approaches to the control of sex in advertising, and how the doubts show al nigh the effectiveness of self-regulation (e. g. , Rotfeld 2003) can be part assu progressd.Besides, effectual concerns keep world expressed in the United States closely the say-so impact of sexualized force against women in ads on the acceptance of such behavior (Capella, Hill, Rapp and Kees 2010) so that the abuse of sex in advertising is likely to remain an important U. S. socio-political contend whose resolution can profit from lie withing the French experience. For these characters, we will start by analyzing the stimuli that prompted French legal and self-regulatory responses, and conclude with a brief comparison of the French and U. S. control systems. Stimulus th e Sex in publicizing Issue Sex in advertising as a coordinate of exchange sin (Davidson 2003) has long handd negative reactions. Thus, the premier(prenominal) International Code of advertise place of the International Chamber of Commerce already stated in word 1 of its 1937 Rules that Advertisements should not contain statements or optical de rankations which kick d professstairs against prevailing standards of decency. This principle has been choose by many demonstrable and growing countries, and it is expressed in one form or an separate in their justnesss and codes of conduct. a great deal of the decency issue used to be about goods and run thought to be impermissible (e. g. toilet piece and feminine-hygiene products) and whether an ads execution was in good taste and shown at the appropriate time with the communicate and television air of objectionable commercials universe molded to late hours of the day. Nowadays, sexually-oriented ads hold up to all so rts of goods and services (e. g. , clothing, perfumes, jewelry, 3 alcohol, video games, stall phones and movies), they atomic number 18 available on the lucre at all hours, and they frequently come up from advertizers in the luxury-goods sector (e. g. , Dior). Such fearless practices reflect the modern sexualization of mores and values in Western countries (e. . , Giddens 1993 McNair 1996 Reichert 2003) with several(prenominal) French intensitys having such evocative titles and subtitles as The Pornographic Consensus, Sexyvilisation and The dictatorship of Pleasure. It helps explain the advent around 2000 of sexually-oriented ads that amalgamate smutography, violence and submission, and reflect McNairs (2002) Porno-chic idea which incorporates into cultural production some practices (such as fellatio) and taboos (such as pedophilia) that transfer the transgressive qualities of pornography into mainstream civilisation. To reason the scope of sex in advertising, Loubrad ou (2004, 2010) developed the concept of hypersexual urge (also used by the French self-regulatory system) to encompass (1) full nudity and/or sexual organs shown in close-ups (2) the executeion of products and services associated with sexual intercourse (e. g. , condoms, lubricants, see to it services and sex toys) (3) Sex andShockvertising that combines sexual information with fear and shock a strategy oddly used in public-service c antiophthalmic factoraigns about AIDS and against child abuse, (4) screening or evoking sexual intercourse, homosexual relations, fellatio, sadomasochism and violence against women, and (5) sheer pornography as in an profits ad exhibiting fellatio. Such ads generate four major types of objections (Boddewyn 1989, pp. 9-32 1991, p. 26) sexism covers distinctions which diminish or demean one gender in comparison with the other particularly, through the use of sex- office stereotypes sexual objectification matchs to using The carriage Porno-chi c was commencement ceremony used in 1973 by a virgin York Times journalist when the porn movie Deep Throat was released because race thought it was chic (that is, trendy) to watch it. McNair (2002, p. 2) define Porno-chic as a wide process of cultural sexualization and pornographication of mainstream culture engaged in an unprecedented flirtation with the codes and conventions of the pornographic, producing texts which constantly refer to, pastiche, parody and deconstruct the latter. As he put it Porno-chic is not porn, and the way of porn in non-pornographic art and culture (p. 1). 1 4 (mostly) women as enhancive or attention-getting objects while sexuality relies on sensual, suggestive and erotic imagery, lumbering and wording, and is sometimes combined with the picture show of violence against women in ads showing them in harmful, submissive and helpless positions. French reactions to these excesses hold back been strong. French ResponsesIncensed Pressure Groups Of th e dozen French consumer associations legally recognized and financially subsidized by the government, most argon linked to family organizations and a few to militant labor unions, and they are officially ack right offledged as valid partners in discussions and negotiations with public and business bodies for the purpose of ensuring consumer protection broadly defined (Trumbull, 2006).These organizations and, subsequently on, environmental ones have been granted a formal political voice a formal status which the French advertising industry has still current very recently (see below). Besides, feminist groups enraged by the treatment of women in advertising have been very influential in France although they have not so far received the same official recognition as consumer and environmental organizations because of their fragmented and sometimes truculent record.Thus, vocal organizations with such evocative name calling as The Hunting Pack, Guardbitches and publicise Wreckers managed in the 1980s to focus the sex in advertising issue around male chauvinist inconsistency, the objectification of women and the violence shown against them the latter following studies unveil the extent of actual brutality against women (beatings, rapes, etc. ). Feminists stressed the disjunction between the all-inclusive roles and functions of women in modern society, compared to their narrow depiction in advertising ( sonorousness IFP 2001, pp. -6), and their campaigns have practically been reported and discussed in the media which have rotate and amplified these groups demands for more regulations. 5 Public controls cardinal principles compete as far as the French regulation of sex in advertising is concerned namely, liberty of expression and defend the high-handedness of homo beings ( ringing IFM 2008, p. 19) as expressed by the graduation exercise condition of the Freedom of Communication Law (No. 86-107 of 30 September 1986) Audio-visual communication i s free.The exercise of this freedom may be limited only to the extent required, on the one hand, for the notice of serviceman high-handedness, the freedom and property of other heap, the pluralistic nature of the expression of ideas and opinions and, on the other hand, for the adeptguarding of law and order, for national-defense and public-service reasons, for technical reasons intrinsic to the means of communication as thoroughly as for the need to develop a national audio-visual production industry.Besides, Article 3 of the Executive Decree of 27 ring 1992 requires that commercials jimmy truth, decency and human lordliness, and avoid discrimination and violence that uphold heavy behaviors. Article 227-24 of the French penal code revokes the dissemination by any forte of messages of a uncivilized or pornographic nature and likely to seriously harm human dignity when they can be seen by a minor.The governments Conseil Superieur de lAudiovisuel (CSA) is charged with c ontrolling advertising messages after their broadcasting in order to conjure the respect of human dignity, protect children and adolescents, and prohibit messages inciting hatred or violence on account of gender (Rapport IFM 2008, p. 19-20). Searching for New Values Particularly evident in these legal texts are the repeated references to the dignity of human beings a principle already enunciated in the United Nations Universal result of kind Rights (1948).The highlighting of this concept reflects the search for virgin post-modern values which would resign re cor serveations of liberate women in advertisements without caricaturing or mocking their young freedoms, opportunities and responsibilities. In this respect, French feminist pressure groups provided a new discourse aimed at promoting the positive image of 6 women in advertising although, by excluding men, their initiative generated charges of reverse gear sexismHowever, French public opinion and policy were concurrentl y shifting toward banning all forms of discrimination based on gender, age, race, role and handicap so that a compromise could be achieved by adopting a new unisex principle that emphasized the respect of human dignity and thereby protected everyone against objectionable treatments in editorial materials, programs and advertising (Rapport IFP 2001), This new principle was incorporated in various French laws after 1986 and in industry guidelines, starting in 2001. courtyard Decisions The punishable Code has not been used so far because of the high cost of pitiful suits, the reluctance of judges to act as censors of artistic creation (Rapport IFM 2008, p. 20) and their fear of being ridiculed as reactionaries, and the difficulty for associations to sue in criminal courts (Teyssier 2004, p. 168). Thus, it was the Civil Codes basic Article 1382, which obliges whoever injured others to retaliate them for the legal damage he/she caused, which was used to condemn Benetton in 1996 for thr ee 1991 hoardings showing an elbow, a pubic area and a pair of just promptlytocks stamped H.I. V. positive. A French governmental agency (AFLS) charged with informing the public about AIDS sued Benetton and was paying damages on the ground of this advertiser having lowmined the human dignity of those affected by this disease by evoking the way bone marrow is stamped and the tat besidesing of concentration-camp inmates during World War II, besides marginalizing a group of people by representing them as a marked population.Private Controls The previously mentioned Pornochic transgressions prompted the French advertising selfregulatory body to better its responses to growing criticisms of the use of sex in advertising. In particular, it triggered its October 2001 Recommendation ( substitution class de la Personne Humaine) fostering the dignity of human beings in the representation of people in advertisements. This 7 voluntary guideline states that ads should not hurt their audi ences feelings nor shock people by showing demeaning or alienating nudity, violence against people peculiarly women or depicting people as objects.Concerned about the impact of advertising on minors, an April 2005 Recommendation specified that profits ads should not harm the physical and virtuous justness of its young public by promoting illicit, high-pressure, dangerous and antisocial behaviors, challenging the authority of parents and educators, representing children and adolescents in degrading manners, presenting them with inauspicious or violent images and speech that may shock them, and exploiting their inexperience or credulity.In the same vein, a whitethorn 2007 Recommendation applying to erotic electronic services is aimed at promoting human dignity, the fair and true up information of consumers and the protection of young audiences. The French publicizing Self-regulatory System The Professional advertize ordination ascendance (Autorite de la statute Professio nelle de la Publicite, ARPP) was created in June 2008 as a private association completely strong-minded of the government. However, it reports to a French ministry about its hunting of infringements of taste and decency in advertising because its 2003 loyalty Chart (Charte dEngagement) requires it to submit an annual report on The Image of Human Beings in advertizement to the rector in charge of Parity and Professional Equity, and to dissipate it to the public at large. 3 Self-regulatory controls are applied both a priori and a posteriori.In the first place, French advertisers, agencies and media members of the ARPP may apply for non-binding copy advice by its legal experts at the pre-publication stage (15,196 projects were scrutinized in 2009). However, pre-clearance is mandatory in front the broadcasting of all television commercials, and the ARPP can require modifications and yet ban the proposed commercial if it is in breach of The ARPP is the successor of self-regulato ry bodies dating of 1935, and it was named the publicizing bank check Bureau (Bureau de validation de la Publicite, BVP) from 1953 to 2008. The French government itself commissions fencesitter studies such as the Report on the Image of Women in the Media (Rapport IFM 2008) that was solicited by the State Secretary for Solidarity. 2 8 the law and its Recommendations. A posteriori, the ARPP monitors ads on a stochastic basis in all media unpack television where the governments ranking(a) audiovisual aid Council (CSA) prevails. ARPP penalties consist of asking transgressors to transfer or pip their ads, requesting the media to stop stagger an offending ad, and the possibility of taking violators to court.Its decisions are widely publicized, and campaigns are regularly conducted to carry the ARPPs principles, recommendations and services better cognise as well as to incite advertising professionals to act responsibly. The previous BVP self-regulatory body handled complaints from consumers and competitors but the new ARPP structure is more comprehensive and includes external stakeholders.It comprises (1) an advisory denote Ethics Council (CEP) chaired by an independent schoolman to anticipate new societal developments (2) an publicize Parity Council (CPP) of which half of the members represent consumer and environmental associations, and which concerts with industry representatives about the need for new self-regulatory rules, and (3) an independent publicize Deontology Jury (JDP) make up of persons who have no cogitate with industry or consumer associations to solicit and authorise complaints from the public in order to backup the ARPPs monitoring of ads.Impressive Results The 2006 BVP report to the Minister in charge of parity between the sexes dealt only with posters and billboards because they are highly panoptic to all audiences young and adult, pleased or offended. Of 4,288 visuals, only 8 (or 0. 19%) were considered to be violating its R ecommendations. In all cases, the advertisers removed their ads, and the BVP assign the willingness of most outdoor advertisers to consult it originally diffusing their ads for the low incidence of violations. Its report for 2007 (ARPP 2008) dealt with the Image of Human Beings in Advertising with such subtitles as Does advertising diffuse sexual stereotypes? Are there too many images connoting sexuality? and Where does Pornochic stand now? It covered outdoor advertising, newspapers and magazines except those publications targeted at adult audiences (e. g. , girlie magazines) and it compared the sampled ads with its Recommendation on the representation of human beings in advertising, whose images should not offend human dignity, undermine decency, objectify/ consider people, present denigrating stereotypes, induce ideas of submission, subordination or dependence and/or present moral or physical violence. out of 89,076 monitored ads, 96 (or 0. 10%) were found absentminded less than in 2003 (0. 15%) but more than in 2005 (0. 02%) mainly in terms of offending human dignity (51 cases) and on account of the recrudescence of pornochic ads for luxury goods particularly for clothing (e. . , Dolce & Gabbana). The results for 2008 were evening better, with only 46 infractions and a decrease in pornochic ads (ARPP 2009) although these statistics did not cover the net income which even very young audiences know how to maneuver in order to find and recirculate sexually-related materials. For the ARPP even 46 violations were too many and suggested greater professional vigilance and pedagogy so that its first campaign in 2008 was entitled Sexe because pressure should be kept up(p) for even better results (e. g. , against the objectification of women).Following the implementation of the 2008 Jury system (JDP) that solicits and handles complaints from the public, its first report for November 2008-December 2009 let on 24 valid ones of which 18 were relat ed to the protection of human dignity and, in the majority of these cases, the complaint was upheld. Such public complaining and negative Jury decisions are 10 likely to persist because viral advertising on the Internet and viva-voce diffusion have created a immense recirculation of ads with sexual and violent content. 4 For that matter, the French self-regulatory system finds it sometimes troubleatic to handle new issues.Thus, the BVP report for 2005 acknowledged its disinclination about what to decide regarding a billboard showing two homosexual men kissing (Rainbow Attitude Campaign). On the one hand, such a highly visible public display would shock the public so that maximum prudence should be exercised on the other, it would be discriminatory to press a homosexual kiss when straight ones are frequently shown. This advertisement was not found to be in violation of any public regulation or private rule an example of how this self-regulatory body relies on both the law and i ts own Recommendations to control the use of sex in advertising.The new 2008 ARPP system of professional regulation has been publicly recognized in several ways. Thus, a 5 March 2009 law, which reverse into French legislation the recent European Union directive on audiovisual aid services, did officially authorize the Superior Audiovisual Council (CSA) to delegate the preclearance of television commercials to the ARPP. Besides, the genus Paris Appeals court of justice stated on 26 October 2010 that recommendations from the ARPP, even though they have no legal character, are professional practices that the judge essential take into account if they do not contradict a legal or statutory measure. Moreover, professional regulation is now acknowledged and accepted by the French government which through several loyalty Charters (see above) has implicitly agreed not to tell or ban certain practices but requires in exchange an effective system of adequate guidelines as well as an accou ntability evidenced by biannual and transparent monitorings and reports. These agreements amount to a system of co-regulation between public and private 4 Neither French nor U. S. egulators have found effective ways of controlling the diffusion of illegal or inappropriate Internet materials except through the obligation put on Internet Service Providers to remove illegal materials, on advertisers to warn about the sexual content of their messages, and on broadcasters to tenderise parents program-filtering devices. 11 actors who concert and collaborate in the public interest, and help generate a sense of responsibility among advertising professionals now convinced that their industry cannot claim its freedom of speech if it cannot prove its responsibility (Teyssier 2004, 2011).A plan Comparison with the U. S. System In the first place, the French have focused on protecting the dignity of all human beings and forbidding all types of discrimination in advertising while, in the Unite d States, the problem has been framed in terms of protecting minors at the relatively mild price of adults losing only part of their free-speech accountability as far as the broadcasting media are concerned. 5 To be sure, other U. S. edia can still offer indecent and profane materials but they are supposed(p) to reach better targeted audiences excluding minors. Second, compared to the French situation, politically weaker and less affluent U. S. consumer associations have exercised relatively little influence on the government in recent decades, the National make-up for Women has limited its sway to the naming and shaming of sexist advertisers, and even the very influential ghostlike movement did not succeed in its campaigns to cleanse American culture (Lane 2006).Third, in both countries, the government has been the main actor for the control of taste and decency in advertising, with self-regulation a strong second in France and a seemingly weaker one in the United States larg ely because of First-Amendment and antitrust constraints (Rotfeld 2003). Yet, the lack of a French-like self-regulatory organization designed to study social trends, develop and publicize detailed guidelines, sack practitioners, solicit and handle complaints, and penalize wrongdoers has not precluded multiple U. S. nitiatives that add up to a control system Following various Supreme-Court decisions, obscenity and pornography are interdict in all media while impropriety and profanity are forbidden on radio and television except between 1000 PM and 600 AM when children are unlikely to be in the audience. 5 12 that can respond fairly rapidly and effectively to complaints. only U. S. media have a pre-clearance system and most offensive ads are withdrawn by the advertiser or no monthlong diffused by a medium (Edelstein 2003) although some researchers challenge this positive valuation (e. . , Rotfeld 1992). Besides, most sexual ads find their niches convey to behavioral targeting a nd because the vast majority of sex-related ads match the programs where they are shown. Fourth, on account of various Supreme-Court decisions, U. S. government agencies such as the federal official Communications way and the national lot Commission (FTC) have had to severely limit their control of indecent and profane materials in programs and advertisements.Thus, the FTC has rejected any immoral, unscrupulous or unethical test because the latter has never been relied upon as an independent basis for proving unfairness. Besides, the secondary effectuate rationale used by some family associations, U. S. legislators and regulators to justify further restrictions on account of their presumed effects on children and society e. g. , fostering repulsiveness and feeding the prurient appetites of pedophiles and child molesters has not been accepted by the U. S. Supreme Court (Beales 2003).In contrast, such secondary effects have been used to justify all sorts of French proscriptions such as the ARPP Recommendation that Internet ads should not harm the physical and moral integrity of its young public (see above). Fifth, in both France and the United States, advertising practitioners moot that industry rules devised and applied by them are preferable because they know better what the problems and their possible solutions are, and self-regulation generates greater moral adhesion than the law because industry guidelines are voluntarily developed and applied (Boddewyn 1992, pp. -8) even though it tends to improve only when the threat of regulation is real (Loubradou 2010). In this regard, there is increasing coaction between governments and the advertising industry as evidenced by the French trueness Charters while, in the United States, the Childrens Advertising Review Unit (CARU) of the Council of Better Business Bureaus has received the 3 blessing of the Federal Trade Commission which, under the safe harbor provision of the 1998 Child Online cover Protection Act (COPPA), can authorise industry guidelines that help implement this law a practice which also applies to the enjoyment Software Rating Board which assigns age and content ratings to computer- and video-game ads, and which has been favorably evaluated by the FTC (Bravin 2010, p. B1).Finally, while governments, family and consumer associations in both countries are presently very concerned about personal-data privacy, behavioral targeting and the promotion of fatty, salty and sweet foods to children, sex-in-advertising trunk an important issue because of the potential try that sexualized violence in ads and the media may turn over to the desensitization of people and the socialization of aggressive behavior toward women (Capella et al. 2010, p. 45 Liptak 2010, p. A16).In this context, our analysis of the French cultural, political, legal and ethical dimensions of this issue can help us understand under what conditions the above concerns can lead to its pregnant and effecti ve public and private control. References ARPP (2008), Bilan 2007 Publicite et Image de la Personne Humaine. Paris Autorite de Regulation Professionnelle de la Publicite. _____ (2009), Bilan 2008 Publicite et Image de la Personne Humaine. Paris Autorite de Regulation Professionnelle de la Publicite. Beales, J. H.III (2003), The Federal Trade Commissions Use of Unfairness Authority Its Rise, Fall and Resurrection, daybook of Public policy & Marketing, 22(2), Fall, 192-200. Boddewyn, Jean J. (1989), Sexism and Decency in Advertising Government Regulation and Industry Self-regulation in 47 Countries. New York International Advertising Association. _______________ (1991), Controlling Sex and Decency in Advertising Around the World, Journal of Advertising, 20(4), 25-35. _______________ (1992), Global Perspectives on Advertising Self-Regulation Principles and Practices in Thirty-Eight Countries.Westport, CT Quorum Books. 14 Bravin, Jess (2010), Top Court Is side by side(p) Level fo r Games, Wall Street Journal, 1 November, B1. BVP (2006), LImage de la Personne Humaine dans la Publicite en 2006. Paris Bureau de check-out procedure de la Publicite. BVP (2006), Rapport dActivite 2005. Paris Bureau de Verification de la Publicite. BVP (2007), Rapport dActivite 2006. Paris Bureau de Verification de la Publicite. Capella, Michael L. , Ronald P. Hill, Justine M. Rapp, and Jeremy Kees (2010), The Impact of Violence Against Women in Advertisements, Journal of Advertising, 39(4), 35-49.Davidson, Kirk (2003), Selling Sin The Marketing of Socially Unacceptable Products. Westport, CT Praeger. Edelstein, J. S. (2003), Self-Regulation of Advertising An Alternative to Litigation and Government Action, head The Journal of Law and Technology, 43 509-543. Giddens, A. (1993), The duty period of Intimacy Sexuality, Love and Eroticism in Modern Societies. Cambridge, UK Polity Press. Lane, F. S. (2006), The Decency Wars The Campaign to ameliorate American Culture. Amherst, NY Prometheus Books. Liptak, Adam (2010), Law obstruct Sale of Violent Video Games to minors is Debated, New York Times, 3 November, A16.Loubradou, Esther (2004), Du Sexe pour Capter lAttention Les Aspects Juridiques de lUtilisation du Sexe dans la Publicite Francaise. Memoire de Recherche, Social lights University, Toulouse, France. _______________ (2010), Porno-chic et Indecence Mediatique Contributions Interdisciplinaires sur les Enjeux Socio-Juridiques et Communicationnels des Contenus Sexuels dans les Medias de masse Francais et Americains, doctoral dissertation (Law and Communication), Social Science University, Toulouse, France.McNair, B. (1996), Mediated Sex Pornography and Post-Modern Culture. capital of the United Kingdom and New York Arnold. _________ (2002), Striptease Culture, Sex, Media and the Democratisation of Desire. capital of the United Kingdom and New York Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group. Rapport IFM (2008), Rapport sur lImage des Femmes dans les Media s. Paris Commission de Reflexion sur lImage des Femmes dans les Medias, 25 September. Rapport IFP (2001), Rapport du Groupe dExperts sur lImage des Femmes dans la Publicite.Paris Secretaire dEtat aux Droits des Femmes et a la Formation Professionnelle, July. 15 Reichert, tom (2003), The Erotic History of Advertising. Amherst, NY Prometheus Books. Richards, Jef I. (2009), Common Fallacies in Law-Related Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Affairs, 43(1), 174-180. Rotfeld, Herbert J. (1992), Power and Limitations of Media Clearance Practices and Advertising Self-Regulation, Journal of Public constitution & Marketing, 11(Spring), 87-95. ______________ (2003), Desires Versus the Reality of Self-Regulation, Journal of Consumer Affairs, 37(2), 424-427. _______________ and M. R. Stafford (2007), Toward a practical Understanding of the Advertising and Public Policy Literature, Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising, 29(1), 67-80. _______________ and Charles R. Taylor (2009), Advertising Regulation and Self-Regulation Issues Ripped from the Headlines With (Sometimes Missed) Opportunities for Disciplined Multidisciplinary Research, Journal of Advertising, 38(4), 5-14.Teyssier, Jean-Pierre (2004), Frapper sans Heurter Quelle Ethique pour la Publicite? Paris Armand Colin. _________________ (2011), Advertising Regulation and Self-Regulation in France. Working paper to be published as a chapter in a forthcoming book edited by Mary Alice claw and to be published by M. E. Sharpe. Trumbull, Gunnar (2006), Consumer capitalist economy Politics, Product Markets, and Firm Strategy in France and Germany. Ithaca, NY Cornell University Press.